Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9624 (AP)

Vaddi Rama Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/5766/2025 · 2025-03-10

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010106732025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 5766/2025 Between: 1. VADDI RAMA RAO, W/O VADDI SI RAMA MURTHY. AGED 57 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/ D.NO. 7-14-1. NEW. COLONY, SRIKAKULAM 2. VARANASI NEELAKANTHESWSAR RAO., S/O V. SIVANARAYANA AGED 52 YEARS, OCC CHARTERED ACCOUNTANT. R/O D.NO. 30- 11-11, LAKSHMI STREET DABAGARDENS VISAKHAPATNAM 3. NARAYANACHETTY TRINATH RAO., S/O N. HRUSHIKESAVA RAO AGED 56 YEARS, OCC CA, R/O SAI MANDIR ROAD, NEW COLONY,RAYAGADA, ORISSA. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, (STAMPS AND REGISTRATION) SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE ANDHRA PRADESH STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, REP BY BRANCH MANAGER, D.NO. 20-21-6, 2ND FLOOR, PLOT NO. SIMHADRINAGAR, VIZIANAGARAM. 3. THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR, VISAKHAPATNAMDISTRICT, VISAKHAPATNAM. 4. SMT CHEKURI SUDHARANI, W/O SRI CH VENKATAPATI RAJU AGED 47 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O DR NO. 9-32-7, NEAR 2 KALABHARTHI, PITHAPURAM COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM 5. SMT CHEKURI MADHURI, W/O CH SIVAJI RAO AGED 33 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O MIG-II, PLOT NO. 31, SECTOR-6, MVP COLONY, VISAKHAPATHAM. 6. GOTTAPU SATYANARAYANA, S/O G RAMASWAMY, AGED 64 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O DR NO. 58-17-4/1, SANJEEVAIAH NAGAR, NAD NEW ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM. 7. GTTAPU VENUGOPALA NAIDU, S/O SATYANARAYANA AGED 39 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O DR NO. 58-17-4/1, SANJEEVAIAH NAGAR, NAD NEW ROAD, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pleased to pass an order or direction or writ in the nature of Mandamus duly declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in trying to deliver the original title deeds of property vide registered sale deeds Nos. 54/2009 and 55/2009, in respect of property vide Plot (Patta) No. 583 in survey No. 281, situated at Madhuravada, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, within the limits of Greater Visakapatnam Municipal Corporation admeasuring about 3638 sq yards, without considering the request of the petitioners not to release the same, as illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and consequently, direct the 2nd respondent not to release the documents and 3rd respondent not to entertain any registrations in respect of the above said property in the interest of justice IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 2nd respondent not to release the documents and 3rd respondent not to entertain any registrations in respect of property vide Plot (Patta) No. 583 in survey No. 281, situated at Madhuravada, Visakhapatnam Rural Mandal, within the limits of Greater Visakapatnam Municipal Corporation admeasuring about 3638 sq yards, in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P RAMA SHARANA SHARMA 3 Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REGISTRATION AND STAMPS The Court made the following: ::ORDER:: Sri P.Rama Sharana Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioners appearing through online seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Dated: 10.03.2025 SNI 4 135 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.5766 OF 2025 Dated: 10.03.2025 SNI