HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11047 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "issue an order or direction in the nature directing the Court of Civil Judge (J.D.) SHARKI Allahabad, to decide the Stay Application/6C Application pending in Civil Suit No. 531 of 2024 (Triloki Vs. Mahdei and 21 Others) filed by the petitioner in a stipulated time as fix by this Hon'ble court, otherwise Applicant will suffer irreparable loss and injury." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending since 2024 and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (J.D.) Sharki Allahabad to Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Madan Mohan, Parmeshwar Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Triloki .....Petitioner(s) Mahdei And 21 Others .....Respondent(s) consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 16, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 11047 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad