IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 131 HARVINDER SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. 2023, for quashing of FIR No. Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120 Patiala, and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom. 2. wherein the petitioner alongwith Gurdarshan Singh had been specifically named and attributed the role of taking the complainant to the office of Tehsildar in the Mini Secretariat, for signing as a witness regarding their plot, however, instead got signe power of attorney from him, he knew nothing about the same and even in the application submitted by him, name of the petitioner finds mentioned, therefore, for the petitioner, who has stated in the instant petition that he IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: HARVINDER SINGH Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Ms. Kamalpreet Kaur Dhaliwal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. M.S.Bajwa, DAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, for quashing of FIR No.216 dated 31.08.2024, re 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B IPC, at Police Station Tripri, Patiala, and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom. Learned State counsel refers to the FIR, Annexure P wherein the petitioner alongwith Balwinder Singh, Ravinder Singh and Gurdarshan Singh had been specifically named and attributed the role of taking the complainant to the office of Tehsildar in the Mini Secretariat, for signing as a witness regarding their plot, however, instead got signe power of attorney from him, he knew nothing about the same and even in the application submitted by him, name of the petitioner finds mentioned, therefore, for the petitioner, who has stated in the instant petition that he IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-48213-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 01.09.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY s. Kamalpreet Kaur Dhaliwal, Advocate, . This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS, dated 31.08.2024, registered under B IPC, at Police Station Tripri, Patiala, and all the subsequent proceedings arising therefrom. Learned State counsel refers to the FIR, Annexure P-1, Balwinder Singh, Ravinder Singh and Gurdarshan Singh had been specifically named and attributed the role of taking the complainant to the office of Tehsildar in the Mini Secretariat, for signing as a witness regarding their plot, however, instead got signed a power of attorney from him, he knew nothing about the same and even in the application submitted by him, name of the petitioner finds mentioned, therefore, for the petitioner, who has stated in the instant petition that he PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.09.02 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-48213-2025 -2- has been nominated only on the statement of co-accused Hardeep Singh, is factually incorrect. Furthermore, charges have been framed and the case is now listed on 16.09.2025 for prosecution evidence. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner, after arguing for some time, realizing that the Court is not inclined, prays for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to take all pleas before the trial Court at the appropriate stage, in accordance with law. 4. Ordered accordingly. 01.09.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.09.02 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.