[2025:RJ-JP:37781] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1793/2009 Rubi Sharma wife of Shri Ajay Kumar Sharma, aged about 41 years, resident of House No.1/120, Housing Board Jawahar Nagar, Bharatpur (Raj.) presently working as ANM in the office of Zila Prajanam avam Shishu Shwasth Adhikari, Bharatpur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Director, Medical & Health Services Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. Joint Director, Medical & Health Services, Bharatpur Division, Bharatpur. 3. Chief Medical & Health Officer, Bharatpur (Raj.). 4. Zila Prajanam avam Shishu Shwasth Adhikari, Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Non-petitioners For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prakhar Jain & Mr. Rahul Verma on behalf of Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA Order 16/09/2025 1. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the petitioner even in the second round. 2. The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition for seeking a direction against the non-petitioners to make payment of due salary including all admissible dues. 3. At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the non- petitioners has indicated that the petitioner has rushed to the Court in hot haste as payment prayed in the writ petition has already been made to the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:37781] (2 of 2) [CW-1793/2009] 4. Para 3 of the reply to the writ petition is being re- produced hereunder:- "That the contents of Para No.3 of the writ petition are not admitted in the manner stated therein. The Petitioner has concealed the facts with respect to the payments received by her. It is well within the knowledge of the Petitioner that her claims have been entertained and are being entertained, but she in a hot haste in an impatient manner, has rushed to this Hon'ble Court by filing the present writ petition. To make the position specific and clear, it is respectfully submitted that the payments on account of Bonus payable to the Petitioner for the year 2006-07 drawn through Bill No.91 dated 08th of November, 2007 and Bonus for the year 2007-08 drawn through Bill No.90 dated 03rd of November, 2008, have already been made to the Petitioner, even prior to filing of the writ petition. As far as the salary of the Petitioner for the months of April, 2006 to July, 2006, has already been drawn through Bill No.31 dated 17th of January, 2009, and the payment thereof is being arranged. The payment of salary for the month of March, 2009 has also been drawn through Bill No.36 dated 21st of July, 2007 and made over to the Petitioner. Process for other claims of the Petitioner including the benefits arising out of recommendations of the VIth Pay Commission are in hand and going to be finalized within a short span. It is respectfully submitted that the Petitioner has not given out the full facts rather concealed the material facts from the Hon'ble Court, simply to gain sympathy of the Hon'ble Court to her own advantage. In this view of the matter, rests of the averments made by the Petitioner, in the Para, under Reply, lose their significance and as such, are denied." 5. No rejoinder to the above reply has been filed on behalf of the petitioner. 6. In view of above, specifically reply in the writ petition, the writ petition filed by the petitioner is hereby dismissed. (ANAND SHARMA),J DIVYA /21