HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11194 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. Perused the report dated 3.10.2025 submitted by Shri Sudhir Mehrotra, learned counsel for the respondents. 3. Since the execution proceedings are pending since 2004 and it has been stated by learned counsel for the petitioner that in pursuance of order dated 28.9.2016 passed by the Civil Judge (Senior Division), Aligarh, steps were taken by the petitioner to get the decree executed through police force. 4. Without going into the merits of case, it is directed that in view of the judgment passed by the Apex Court in case of Periyammal vs. B. Rajmani; 2025 SCC Online SC 507, wherein it has directed that the execution proceedings should normally be decided within six months, it is directed that Executing Court shall make every endeavour to decide the execution proceedings as per the direction given by the Apex Court in Periyammal (Supra), within a period of six months without being influenced by any other pending proceedings subject to any interim order passed by any Court. 5. With these observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. October 8, 2025 Rishabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rishi Chadha Counsel for Respondent(s) : Sudhir Mehrotra, Vibhanshu Vaibhav (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Arif Khan .....Petitioner(s) Nagar Nigam, Aligarh And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad