Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9621 (JK)

SHABIR AHMAD GANIE v. RIFAT ARA

CRM(M)/766/2024 · 2025-09-02

Wasim Sadiq Nargal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Serial No. 70 REGULAR LIST IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CRM(M) 766/2024 SHABIR AHMAD GANIE …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: None Vs. RIFAT ARA ...Respondent(s) Through: None CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 02.09.2025 The record reveals that for the last two consecutive dates of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and today also when the instant petition was taken up in the pre-lunch-session, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner and the matter was directed to be taken up in the post-lunch-session. Accordingly, the matter was taken up in the post-lunch-session, again there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant matter. Dismissed for non-prosecution. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE SRINAGAR: 02.09.2025 Akhil Dev