Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 96204 (ALL)

VINOD KUMAR AND 4 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 15 OTHERS

WRIC/32508/2025 · 2025-09-16

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32508 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. In proceeding under Section 176 of U.P.Z.A. & L.R. Act an order of status quo was passed which, on objection filed by one of the parties, was vacated. Petitioner has filed a revision in which interim order was granted but one of the respondent had violated the injunction order which led to filing of contempt application and, thereafter, the construction was stopped. According to petitioner, the contempt application was dismissed for want of prosecution in which a restoration application has been moved, which is pending consideration. After dismissal of contempt application the private respondents have again started raising construction. 2. Once it is an admitted position that restoration application is pending in contempt proceedings, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or issuing notice to the private respondents, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit, requiring the revenue authorities to proceed with the restoration application filed contempt proceedings and decide the same, in accordance with law, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 3. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of. September 17, 2025 Shekhar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Dharm Vir Jaiswal, Harsh Vikram Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Vinod Kumar And 4 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 15 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad