Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 CGHC010463922025
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 12849 of 2025 RAM KUMAR BAIS versus STATE OF CHHATTISGARH 28/07/2026 Mr. Aman Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Luv Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer for the State. By the impugned order, the petitioner seeks quashment of the order dated 16/09/2025. By referring para-4 of the reply, learned counsel for the State would submit that despite regularization in the regular establishment of the work charged and contingency paid establishment in favour of the petitioner, he did not performed the duties of the said post and on his own, he worked with the office of the respondent as a Daily Wager till the date of his superannuation and was paid the wages during that period on Collector rate. AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Digitally signed by AMARDEEP CHOUBEY Date: 2026.07.29 10:45:13 +0530
2 Amardeep Two weeks time is granted to the petitioner to controvert the aforesaid contention of the State by filing rejoinder, if so desired. Post it after two weeks. SD/-
(Bibhu Datta Guru)
Judge