IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Misc. Appeal No.279 of 2014 ------ Subendu Mohanty son of Late Bramhanand Mohanty resident of Village Kuraibaid, P.O. & P.S. Boro, District Purulia, State West Bengal .... .... .... Appellant Versus 1. Bimal Sarangi son of Late Ram Chandra Sarangi 2. Ashok Sarangi son of Late Ram Chandra Sarangi Both are residents of Village Sarangidih, P.O & P.S. Kamalpur, Patamda, District Singhbhum East 3. Shibu Mahato son of Madhu Sudan Mahato resident of Village Pathardih, P.O & P.S. Patamda, District Singhbhum East 4. Damudar Sarangi son of Late Ram Chandra Sarangi resident of Village Sarangidih, P.O & P.S. Kamalpur, Patamda, District Singhbhum East 5. United India Insurance Company Ltd., having its Branch Office at 42/1, B T Sarkar Road, Purulia, P.O., P.S. and District Purulia, West Bengal .... .... .... Respondents With W.P. (C) No.6352 of 2014 ------ Subendu Mohanty son of Late Bramhanand Mohanty resident of Village Kuraibaid, P.O. & P.S. Boro, District Purulia, State West Bengal .... .... .... Petitioner Versus 1. Bimal Sarangi son of Late Ram Chandra Sarangi 2. Ashok Sarangi son of Late Ram Chandra Sarangi Both are residents of Village Sarangidih, P.O & P.S. Kamalpur, Patamda, District Singhbhum East 3. Shibu Mahato son of Madhu Sudan Mahato resident of Village Pathardih, P.O & P.S. Patamda, District Singhbhum East 4. Damudar Sarangi son of Late Ram Chandra Sarangi resident of Village Sarangidih, P.O & P.S. Kamalpur, Patamda, District Singhbhum East 5. United India Insurance Company Ltd., having its Branch Office at 42/1, B T Sarkar Road, Purulia, P.O., P.S. and District Purulia, West Bengal .... .... .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY For the Appellant/Petitioner: Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, Advocate Mr. Jitesh Kumar, Advocate ------ Order No.10 / Dated : 30.01.2025 Mr. P.A.S. Pati, learned counsel on behalf of appellant/petitioner submits that he has not received any specific instruction from the appellant/petitioner and the Case Information System shows that the original Claim Case has been disposed of by the Tribunal. Under the circumstance, both these cases are dismissed as not pressed. (Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Anit