Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 96133 (PNJ)

JATINDERPAL SINGH v. TRIBUNAL UNDER MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS AND SENIOR CITIZENS KARNAL AND ORS

CWP/37555/2018 · 2025-03-24

Harsimran Singh Sethi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-37555-2018 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (207) CWP-37555-2018 (O&M) Date of Decision : March 24, 2025 Jatinderpal Singh .. Petitioner Versus The Tribunal under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens, Karnal and others .. Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI Present: Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Gaurav Jindal, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Chakitan Vikram Shekhar Papta, Legal-Aid-Counsel for respondent No.2. HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI J. (ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the parties have amicably settled their issue. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner-son submits that three sons of the respondent No.2-senior citizen, will pay a sum of Rs. 10,000/- each every month in the account of the respondent No.2-senior citizen so that he can live properly. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner-son further submits that the petitioner-son will also look after the respondent No.2-senior citizen in case need arise and that too apart from the payment of the financial assistance. HARSHA RANI 2025.03.26 13:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-37555-2018 (O&M) 2 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner-son further submits that all the three sons will deposit the amount of Rs.10,000/- each in the account of the respondent No.2-senior citizen by 7th of every month and the said amount will be paid starting from 01.01.2025 onwards and the arrears upto March, 2025 will be paid by 07.04.2025 in the account number of the respondent No.2-senior citizen. 5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf respondent No.2-senior citizen submits that keeping in view instructions received from the respondent No.2-senior citizen, he will not get the impugned order dated 12.11.2018 (Annexure P-7) executed in case, all the three sons keep on depositing a sum of Rs.30,000/- every month in his account but liberty be given to the respondent No.2-senior citizen to revive the present petition in case of default of the undertaking on behalf of the sons. 6. Keeping in view the above, the present writ petition is disposed of. 7. Civil miscellaneous application pending if any, also stands disposed of. March 24, 2025 (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) harsha JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether reportable : No HARSHA RANI 2025.03.26 13:58 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document