1 2025:CGHC:9462 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT No. 221 of 2025 Prayanshu Sahu S/o Shri Lekhram Sahu Aged About 29 Years R/o House No. 463, Purana Chandaniya Para, Ward No. 16, Tiwari Bal Udiyan, Janjgir, Distt. Janjgir-Champa (C.G.). ... Petitioner versus 1 - Ms. Divya Umesh Director, Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indravati Bhavan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Mr. Siddharth Komal Pardeshi, Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhavan, Nava Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G.) ---- Respondents ___________________________________________________________ For Petitioner : Mr. Vivek Kumar Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondents : Mr. Neeraj Sharma, Advocate ___________________________________________________________ Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 24/02/2025 1. The present contempt case is being preferred by the petitioner against the respondents/contemnors who have deliberately defied/violated the order dated 21.01.2025 passed in WPS No.7189/2024 and order dated 04.02.2025 passed in MCC No.132/2025 in the matter of Prayanshu Sahu Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors. and have thus committed contempt of this Court. 2 2. Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the D.ed Certificate submitted by the petitioner is sent for verification to the Registrar, OPJS University, VPO- Rawastar Kunjla, Near Sankhu Fort, Rajgarh (Sadulpur)- Jhunjhunu Road, Churu- Rajasthan. He further contended that after verification, if the report is found legal then the petitioner will consider for counseling. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner not opposes the submission made by learned counsel for the respondents. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents with utmost circumspection. 5. Since the submission has been made by learned counsel for the respondents that they will consider the candidature of the petitioner for the counseling after verification of the D.ed Certificate, the said submission appears to be genuine. 6. In view of the, the present contempt case stands disposed of. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Vasant