Alluri Srinivasa Raju v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/6378/2020 · 2025-02-21
Kiranmayee Mandava
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9608 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9608 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH::AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 6378 OF 2020 Between: Alluri Srinivasa Raju, S/o Krishnam raju, aged about 32 years R/o D.No.14-13- 21, Ramachandrapuram Mandalam, East Godavari District ...Petitioner AND
1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary to Govt of A.P. Revenue Department, secretariat, Guntur
2. The District Collector, Kakinada, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District.
3. The Sub-District Collector, Rajahmundry, East Godavari district
4. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District.
5. The Tahsildhar, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ,
order or direction, particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, to declare the action of the respondent no.2 and 5 interfere in Survey No.326 with Plot Nos. 4, 26 an extent of 149.33 Sq.Yds and 190.83 Sq.Yds situated in Dhawleshwaram village, Rajahmundry, East Godavari district bounded by east: Road, west: Plot no.9 N chadravathi North: Plot No.3 M. Veeravenkatsatyanaraya , south: Plot No.5 U.Rambabu and dispossess the petitioner there from without following due process of law is illegal. more revenue common
arbitrary and unjust and without jurisdiction or authority and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and in violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents not to the above said action without following due process of law lA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to interfere in Survey No.326 with Plot Nos. 4, 26 an extent of 149.33 Sq.Yds and 190.83 Sq.Yds situated in Dhawleshwaram revenue village, Rajahmundry, East Godavari bounded by east: Common Road, west; Plot no.9 N Chadravathi North: Plot No.3 M. Veeravenkatsatyanaraya, south; Plot No.5 U.Rambabu And not to dispossess the petitioner there from, pending disposal of the writ petition resort to district Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI BATHULA RAJ KIRAN Counsel for the Respondents No.l to 5: GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: Order
1 - < APHC010105912020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3458] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE KIRANMAYEE MANDAVA WRIT PETITION NO: 6378/2020 Between: Alluri Srinivasa Raju ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. BATH U LA RAJ KIRAN Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: ...RESPONDENT(S)
ORDER: Heard Sri Bathula Raj Kiran, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, appearing for the respondents. Being aggrieved by the action of the respondents, in interfering with the petitioner’s possession of the land with Plot Nos.4, 26 located in Sy. No.326 in an extent of 149.33 Sq. Yds and 190.83 Sq. Yds. situated in
2.
2 Dhawleshwaram revenue Village, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District, the instant Writ Petition is filed.
3. This Court vide order dated 17.03.2020, granted interim order to maintain ‘status quo’.
4. When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue has placed on record a copy of the letter received by him from the Tahsildar, dated 27.01.2025. A perusal of the same would reveal that at present, respondents are not interfering with the petitioner’s possession and further reveals that if any such action is proposed. the same would be done by following due process of law The said letter is placed on record.
5. In view of the foregoing, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There
6. shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications, pending if any, shall stand Sd/- K. TATA RAO deputy registrar closed.s //TRUE COPY// \ SECTION OFFICER Pradesh, Govt of A.P. To, 1 The Principal Secretary, State of Revenue Department, secretariat, Guntur District Collector, Kakinada, Rajahmundry Sub-District Collector, Rajahmundry, East Godavari district East Godavari District. , East Godavari District.
2. The
3. The Divisional Officer, Rajahmundry
4. The Revenue
5. The Tahsildhar, Rajahmundry, East Godavari District BATHULA raj KIRAN Advocate [OPUC] REVENUE (AP), High Court of Andhra Pradesh
6. One CC to SRI 7 Two CCs to GP FOR [OUT!
8. Three CD Copies
HIGH COURT DATED: 21/02/2025
ORDER WP.No.6378 of 2020 X 0 7 m 2025 to ^ Current aecuon ^4LPesPATC\5g DISPOSING THE WP WITHOUT COSTS