GROWPO INTERNATIONAL v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/32258/2025 · 2025-09-15
Arun Kumar, Manoj Kumar Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 96068 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 96068 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32258 of 2025 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.
1. Heard Shri Satyam Singh, Advocate appearing for the petitioner, Shri B. N. Singh, Advocate appearing for respondent No.2 Bank and learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the fact that his bank account has been frozen by the respondent Bank.
3. Undisputedly, the account has been frozen on basis of the direction issued by the Investigating Agency, which is investigating a cyber crime.
4. The case of the petitioner is that there has been a compromise between the petitioner and respondent No.6, at whose best the crime is being investigated.
5. In case there has been a settlement between the parties it is always open to the petitioner to bring the said fact to the notice of the Investigating Agency.
6. At this stage, Shri Satyam Singh, counsel for the petitioner prays for liberty to withdraw the writ petition and move proper representation before the Investigating Agency alongwith copy of compromise deed, so that the Investigating Agency may take the same into consideration. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Abhijeet Verma, Satyam Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Satish Chaturvedi Growpo International .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
7. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of with liberty, as prayed. September 16, 2025 Ashok Kr.
WRIC No. 32258 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad