SMT. PUSHPLATA AND 11 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/32373/2025 · 2025-09-22
Arun Kumar, Manoj Kumar Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 96065 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 96065 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32373 of 2025 Court No. - 21 HON'BLE MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, J.
HON'BLE ARUN KUMAR, J.
1. The petitioners have assailed individual notices issued to them by respondent no. 4 on 27.8.2025, stating that the petitioners are in illegal possession of land of Irrigation Department, having constructed house and shop over the same. They were required to demolish the constructions within fifteen days and inform respondent no. 4 about the same. By the same notice, 11.9.2025 was fixed seeking reply of the petitioners, failing which, the illegal possession and the constructions would be demolished.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners during course of arguments states that after filing of the writ petition, the petitioners have filed their replies to the impugned notices.
3. As the petitioners have already replied to the impugned notices, therefore, we dispose of the instant petition with direction to respondent no. 4 to take decision on the reply submitted by the petitioners within six weeks from the date of communication of the instant order and till then, no action shall be taken on basis of the impugned notices. Thereafter, the impugned notices would abide by the decision that would be taken by respondent no. 4 in pursuance of the instant order.
Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ajai Kumar Mishra, Rahul Kumar Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Smt. Pushplata And 11 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
4. The petitioners will file a copy of the instant order before respondent no. 4 positively within two weeks from today, along with supplementary representation, if any, and supporting evidence.
5. In case copy of the instant order is not communicated to respondent no. 4 within two weeks from today, the protection granted to the petitioners would be of no avail and it shall be open to the fourth respondent to proceed in the matter in accordance with law. September 23, 2025 Jaideep/- WRIC No. 32373 of 2025 2 (Arun Kumar,J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta,J.) Digitally signed by :- JAIDEEP BANERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- JAIDEEP BANERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- JAIDEEP BANERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad