KHUSHI RAM AND 7 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. AND 10 OTHERS
WRIC/33598/2025 · 2025-09-23
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 96053 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 96053 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 33598 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer:-
"(a) Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 04.03.2025 passed by Additional Commissioner, Administration, Bareilly Division, Bareilly in Case No. RST/1495/2024 being Revision No.2475 of 2018 (Khushiram Vs. Haripal) (Annexure No.9 to the writ petition). (b) Issue, a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the learned Additional Commissioner, Administration, Bareilly Division, Bareilly to decide the Revision No.2475 of 2018 on merits by allowing restoration application filed by the petitioners."
2. It is contended that a restoration application filed in revision was dismissed, against which, the present writ petition has been filed. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner states that he is not pressing the first prayer made in the writ petition and is only confining to the second prayer made in the writ petition which is for a direction to decide the revision.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction to the respondent no. 2- Additional Commissioner, Administration, Bareilly Division, Bareilly to decide the Revision No. 2475 of 2018 (Khushiram Vs. Haripal), strictly in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of two months from the date of production of certified copy of this order.
4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Darwari Lal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Khushi Ram And 7 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 10 Others .....Respondent(s)
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 24, 2025 A. V. Singh WRIC No. 33598 of 2025 2 (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Digitally signed by :- AJAY VIKRAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad