Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 96049 (MAD)

Sekisui Dljm Molding Pvt Ltd v. M/S.AR Packaging,

Arb O.P(COM.DIV.)/530/2024 · 2025-06-04

Abdul Quddhose

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Arb.OP.(comdiv) No.530 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 04.06.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Arb.O.P.(Comm.Div.) No.530 of 2024 M/s.Sekisui DLJM Molding Pvt Ltd., Kancheepuram. .. Petitioner -vs- M/s.AR Packaging, Kancheepuram. .. Respondent Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, has been filed seeking to set aside the arbitral award dated 23.11.2023 passed by the MSE Facilitation Council, Chennai. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Mahaveer For Respondent : Mr.M.V.V.N.Sivanthy 1/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Arb.OP.(comdiv) No.530 of 2024 ABDUL QUDDHOSE, J. ORDER The matter is listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. On the last hearing date, i.e., on 17.04.2025, it was recorded that the petitioner did not meet the respondent for arriving at an amicable settlement and the petitioner is also not ready to argue the matter. As seen from the earlier proceedings, repeated adjournments were sought for by the learned counsel for the petitioner for arriving at an amicable settlement. This petition is of the year 2024. Since sufficient opportunities have been granted by this Court to the petitioner to arrive at an amicable settlement or to argue the matter, and since this matter is listed today under the caption “for dismissal”, no further indulgence can be shown to the petitioner, as the learned counsel for the petitioner is not ready for arguments even today. It can now be inferred that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this petition. Accordingly, this petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No Costs. 04.06.2025 rkm Arb.O.P.(Comm.Div.) No.530 of 2024 2/2 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis