Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9604 (KAR)

THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER v. THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER AND ORS

WP/203312/2017 · 2025-06-12

Ravi V Hosmani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3035 WP No. 203312 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI WRIT PETITION NO.203312 OF 2017 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN: THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, N.E.K.R.T.C., KALABURAGI DIVISION-I, KALABURAGI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI DEEPAK V.BARAD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY LABOUR COMMISSIONER, AND APPELLANTE CONTROLLING AUTHORITY, UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, AT KALABURAGI – 585 103. 2. THE ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER, & CONTROLLING AUTHORITY, UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, AT KALABURAGI – 585 103. 3. ABDUL FAZAL S/O MUSTAFA BAIG, AGED: ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC: RETD,. EMPLOYEE, R/O: NEAR DEPOT, JEWARGI, TQ: JEWARGI, DIST: KALABURAGI – 585 103. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI GOPAL KRISHNA B.YADAV, H.C.G.P., FOR R1 AND R2) Digitally signed by RAMESH MATHAPATI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-K:3035 WP No. 203312 of 2017 THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO, ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI THEREBY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED-30.06.2016 PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN ¥ÀæPÀgÀt ¸ÀASÉå : GPÁDUÀÄ/¦fJ/C¦Ã¯ï/¹Dgï-18/2015 AS AT ANNEXURE-D TO THE WRIT PETITION, II) ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI THEREBY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED- 30.04.2015 PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN ¸ÀASÉå : ¸ÀPÁDPÀ/G¥ÁPÁ/¹Dgï-18/2013 AS AT ANNEXURE-B TO THE WRIT PETITION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI V HOSMANI ORAL ORDER As per order dated 15.04.2025, petitioner was required to take out notice to respondent no.3. Counsel for petitioner submits that paper publication is not taken out. 2. In view of non compliance, petition is dismissed as against respondent no.3. 3. Since, respondent no.3 is contesting respondent, Writ Petition is dismissed. Sd/- (RAVI V HOSMANI) JUDGE NJ/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 1/Ct;Vk