Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9601 (GAU)

SMTI HEEMA BARKATAKI v. THE UNION OF INDIA AND ANR

WP(C)/1663/2025 · 2025-03-25

Suman Shyam

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010060582025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/1663/2025 SMTI HEEMA BARKATAKI SAHARA INDIA FINANCIAL CORPORATION LTD., OFFICE AT R.N.C PATH, P.O. AND P.S. AND DISTRICT- DIBRUGARH, ASSAM, W/O- SRI NIHAR CH. DAS, R/O- BANSHBARI, P.O., P.S. AND DIST. DIBRUGARH, ASSAM, PIN- 786003. VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND ANR REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, SHRAM SHAKTI BHAVAN, NEW DELHI-110001. 2:THE ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER (CENTRAL) CHOKIDNGHEE DIBRUGARH PIN- 786001 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR N N UPADHYAYA, MR. R DHAR,MR. B B KAKATI Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM ORDER Date : 26-03-2025 Mr. N.N. Upadhyay, learned counsel for the writ petitioner submits that there are Page No.# 2/2 some defects in the writ petition, which calls for rectification. Therefore, the petitioner be given leave to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh. Since the prayer is not opposed by the respondents’ counsel, the same stands allowed. With petition stands disposed of on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE GS Comparing Assistant