Anandharamadhas @ AnanthaRamadass v. State Rep By its, The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/24029/2025 · 2025-09-02
G Jayachandran
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 96000 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 96000 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.24029 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED :02.09.2025 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Crl.O.P.No.24029 of 2025 1.Anandharamadhas @ Anantha Ramadass, M/A 49 years S/o Ramadas, No.1-1-43, Moolakkadai, Chettiyur Road, Kannamoochi, Salem District. 2.Kolanthasamy, M/A 59 years, S/o Chinnamangagoundar, No.3/4-71, Uppukkallur, Kannamoochi Post, Mettur Taluk, Salem District. 3.Dhandapani,M/A 53 years, S/o Ramasamy gounder, No.2/451,Vaikkal Road, Vaniputhur, Erode District. ..Petitioners/Accused No.1 to 3 /versus/ State rep.by its The Inspector of Police, Kolathur Police Station, Salem District. (Crime No.319 of 2025) ..Respondent/Complainant 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.24029 of 2025 PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of arrest in Crime No.319 of 2025 on the file of the respondent. For Petitioner :Mr.C.Deepak Kumar For Respondent :Mr.S.Udhyakumar Government Advocate (Crl. Side) O R D E R The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence under Section 420 of IPC in Crime No.319 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. Sum and substance of the complaint is that the property of one Chellappan remained undivided among his legal heirs for nearly 50 years. On 17.05.2022 a power of attorney was executed by his legal heirs, by name Kunjappan, his daughter Kanika, Rasammal, Pappathi and Palanisamy in favour of the first petitioner. The said Kunjappan died on 28.06.2022 and thereafter, the power of attorney has become invalid. However, it is alleged that the first petitioner had sold the property based on the invalid power of attorney. Hence, this complaint. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.24029 of 2025 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have no role in the crime. 4.However, the complaint clearly shows that after the death of one of the principal by name, Kunjappan, the property has been alienated based on the power of attorney. It is the matter to be investigated in accordance with law for which custodial interrogation of the petitioners is required. Hence, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 02.09.2025 ari To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.1, Mettur. 2.The Inspector of Police, Kolathur Police Station, Salem District. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.24029 of 2025 ari Crl.O.P.No.24029 of 2025 02.09.2025 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis