Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9600 (KAR)

KRISHNAMURTY AND ANR v. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER AND ORS

MFA/200402/2019 · 2025-03-27

C M Joshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1995 MFA No. 200402 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, KALABURAGI BENCH DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI MISCL. FIRST APPEAL NO.200402 OF 2019 (MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. KRISHNAMURTY S/O BASALINGAYYA, AGE: 69 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, 2. SMT. ERAMANI W/O KRISHNAMURTHY, AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD, BOTH R/O STATION SAIDAPUR, TQ. & DIST YADGIRI. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. VIKRAM VIJAYKUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER, THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., NG COMPLEX, 1ST FLOOR, OPP: MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, KALABURAGI-585 101. 2. SRI. SATYANARAYANA S/O KRISHNAMURTY, AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O STATION SAIDAPUR, TQ. & DIST. YADGIRI-585 201. 3. SRI. RAJU T. S/O T. RAMULU, AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: OWNER OF LORRY BEARING REG. NO. AP-22, W-2466, R/O BALANAGAR, MAHABOOBNAGAR DIST., ANDRA PRADESH-509 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. J. AUGUSTIN, ADV. FOR R1; R2-SERVED; V/O DTD. 31.07.2024, NOTICE TO R3 D/W) Digitally signed by SHIVALEELA DATTATRAYA UDAGI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-K:1995 MFA No. 200402 of 2019 THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, PRAYING TO MODIFYING THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 23.11.2011 PASSED BY THE MACT-II AT YADGIR IN MVC NO.42/2010 AND THE SAME WAS ALLOWED IN PART AND CONSEQUENTLY BE PLEASED TO ENHANCE THE COMPENSATION AS PRAYED FOR. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FURTHER ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C M JOSHI) None appear for the appellants in the forenoon sessions and even in the afternoon session when the matter called. Therefore, it appears the appellants are not interested in prosecuting the matter. The appeal is filed with delay of 2575 days and the application for condonation of delay has been opposed by learned counsel for respondent No.1. In view of the non-prosecution, the appeal is dismissed. Sd/- (C M JOSHI) JUDGE SDU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 22 CT: AK