SUBIR CHANDER SONEY v. MUNICIPAL COUNCIL SULTANPUR LODHI AND OTHERS
CR/563/2025 · 2025-05-05
Harkesh Manuja
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9599 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9599 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 184 CR-563-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 05.05.2025 Subir Chander Soney ......Petitioner Versus M.C. Sultanpur Lodhi and Ors. .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. H.S. Rakhra, Advocate for the petitioner.
HARKESH MANUJA, J (ORAL) Instant petition has been preferred under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a direction to the official respondents for staying the demolition of the ground floor of the building during the pendency of the application for restoration of the third party objections, which was dismissed in default on 14.11.2024. At the very outset, learned counsel representing the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition with liberty to approach the trial Court for claiming the relief. Dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.
( HARKESH MANUJA ) JUDGE 05.05.2025 manoj
1. Whether speaking/ reasoned : Yes /No
2. Whether reportable : Yes /No MANOJ KUMAR 2025.05.07 02:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order