HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 7603 of 2025 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE VIVEK VARMA, J. 1. Heard counsel for the applicants as well as Sri V.P. Tripathi, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 2. This application has been filed with the prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicants in Case Crime No.56 of 2025, under sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B I.P.C., P.S. Bhawanpur, District Meerut. 3. Counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicants are the bona fide purchasers of the land in dispute by means of registered sale deeds dated 21.2.2023. The stamp as well as sale consideration was duly paid by the applicants. The applicants themselves are the victim of fraud. The applicants have not forged or manipulated any documents. The case of the applicants is clearly distinguishable from that of co-accused Khalid Hasan. The necessary ingredients to constitute the alleged offences are not made out against the applicants. The applicants have no criminal antecedents. Investigation is pending and the applicants have apprehension of their arrest in the above mentioned case. In case, the applicants are granted anticipatory bail, they will not misuse the said liberty. 4. Learned A.G.A. for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Having regard to the submissions made, considering the nature of accusations, antecedents of the applicants, and in the fact that the applicants are the purchasers of the land in dispute, the sale deed records that the stamp as well as sale consideration was duly paid, at this stage there is no substantive evidence to link the applicant with the offence, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that the applicants are entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail. 6. In the event of arrest, the applicants Dilshad and Mohammad Saleem, involved in Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mukesh Chandra Gupta, Shubham Prakash Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dilshad And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) the aforesaid case crime be released on anticipatory bail during pendency of trial, on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants shall co-operate with the Investigating Officer during investigation and shall report to the Investigating Officer as and when required for the purpose of conducting investigation; (ii) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer; (iii) The applicants shall not leave the country during the pendency of trial without prior permission from the concerned trial Court. (iv) The applicants shall surrender their passport, if any, to the concerned Court forthwith. Their passport will remain in custody of the concerned Court. (v) The applicants shall file an undertaking to the effect that they shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence and the witnesses are present in court. (vi) The applicants shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. 7. In default of any of the conditions, the court concerned is at liberty to pass appropriate orders for enforcing and compelling the same. 8. The application stands disposed of. September 17, 2025 S.S. NABAIL No. 7603 of 2025 2 (Vivek Varma,J.) Digitally signed by :- SIDDHARTH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad