Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 95985 (ALL)

ROHAN ALIAS PINTU v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/31550/2025 · 2025-09-15

Krishan Pahal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31550 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Sharad Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.99 of 2025, under Sections 325 B.N.S. and Section 3/5/8 of Cow Slaughter Prevention Act and Section 4/25 Arms Act, Police Station-Radhanagar, District-Fatehpur, during the pendency of trial. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant is mentally ill person and has completed his studies at IIT, Chennai. The applicant has nothing to do with the said offence. The allegations are per se false. The applicant has been falsely implicated in the instant case out of vengeance. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 02.07.2025 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. Learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the bail application. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed. 7. Let the applicant-Rohan Alias Pintu, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence during trial. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sharad Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rohan Alias Pintu .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) (iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 8. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 9. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. September 16, 2025 Karan BAIL No. 31550 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- KARAN KUMAR RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad