Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.276 of 2025 In CRIMINAL REVISION No.149 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2023 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE District- Patna ====================================================== Sonam Kumari D/O Late Rajeshwar Prasad, W/O Sanjay Kumar R/O Mohalla - Pirmadiya, P.S. - Malsalami, Distt- Patna ... ... Appellant/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Sanju Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, Spl. PP ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 5 07-03-2025 Heard Mr. Ajay Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Vinay Krishna, learned Spl. PP representing the State.
2. Although, the appellant wanted setting aside the
order dated 10.01.2024 passed in Complaint Case No. 40 (C) of 2023 passed by the learned Exclusive Special Court SC/ST, Patna.
3. Though, learned counsel for the appellant wanted quashing of the said order by which the Court wanted the statement of the appellant to be recorded, now he has changed the prayer and as per that, for one year, though the petition is pending, the concerned court should move forward.
Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.276 of 2025(5) dt.07-03-2025 2/2
4. Learned Spl. PP submits that in view of the limited prayer to direct the concerned court to take the matter to its logical conclusion, filed under section 200 of the Cr.P.C., for the said direction can be issued.
5. In that background, the appeal stands disposed of with a direction to the learned court concerned to take up the petition of the appellant to its logical conclusion at an earliest as it has been filed in the year 2023 itself.
vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T