Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9597 (AP)

Dasari Bhanu Padma, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/6661/2020 · 2025-09-10

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010105992020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE ELEVENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 6661/2020 Between: 1. DASARI BHANU PADMA,, D/O.RAMA SITHA , HINDU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O. 5TH LANE, BUTCHAIAH THOTA, NEHRU NAGAR, GUNTUR. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGZ.PUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT, 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KOTHAPET POLICE STATION, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 5. THE TAHSILDAR, GUNTUR EAST MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 6. KATURI VEERA VASANTHA RAO, S/O. LATE DANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/O. 6TH LANE, BUCHAIAH THOTA, GUNTUR TOWN AND DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K SRINIVAS Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. S SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a issue an appropriate writ, or order or direction, more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of th(. 5th respondent in issuing the Notice Under Section 145 Cr.P.0 in Rc.No.113/2020-C dated 24.02.2020 issued by the 5th respondent as illegal, arbitrary, and violation 2 of principles of natural justice and consequently set aside the same” 2. Today, when the matter came up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing survives for adjudication in the Writ Petition and the matter has become infructuous. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. __________________________________ Dr.VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA, J Date: 11.09.2025 Asr 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.6661 of 2020 Dt.11.09.2025 Asr