1 2025:CGHC:9063-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 669 of 2025 Manoj Kumar Pradhan S/o Late Baikunth Bihari Pradhan, aged about 30 years R/o Floral City, Dunda Raipur C.G. Presently Posted As Computer Operator At Jharamuda Procurement Center, Mahasamund C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home Affairs, Capital Complex, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur C.G. 2 - Superintendent of Police, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh 3 - Station House Officer, Police Station Basna, District- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Amritlal Dukhu Pradhan R/o Tala Betari, Basna, Dist. Mahasamund C.G. ... Respondent(s) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Ms. Katyayni Vishnu Priya holding brief of Mr. Raza Ali, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Shailendra Sharma, Panel Lawyer ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 21.02.2025 1. Heard Mr. Ms. Katyayni Vishnu Priya holding brief of Mr. Raza Ali, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Shailendra ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Digitally signed by ROHIT KUMAR CHANDRA Date: 2025.02.21 17:44:26 +0530 2 Sharma, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State/respondent Nos. 1 to 3. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita with the following prayers :- “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to exercise its inherent jurisdiction under Section 528 of B.N.S.S. and in exercise thereof call for the records, if necessary, admit the petition and after parties in the matter quash the FIR No. 63/2024 registered at respondent no.3 police station and/or pass such other orders in favor of the petitioner as this Hon’ble Court may deem it fit in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 3. From perusal of the prayers and pleadings made in the instant petition, the petitioner has only prayed for quashing of the FIR no. 63/2024 without mentioning the particulars of the offences under which it has been registered, which goes to show that the prayer drafted by learned counsel for the petitioner is in a very casual manner, as such, in the opinion of this Court, the prayer is defective one. 4. Accordingly, the instant petition is dismissed on this ground alone with liberty to file afresh petition with appropriate prayer, subject to depositing a sum of Rs.2,000/- as cost by the petitioner in the Registry of this Court within a period of one week from today and 3 the same shall be transmitted to the Government Multi-Disabled Home, Main Road, Bagbahra, District – Mahasamund (C.G.). 5. Certified copy of the documents annexed with this petition shall be returned to the counsel for the petitioners after retaining photocopies of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Chandra