Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Rajasthan · body
2025 DAILYLAW 9593 (RAJ)
NANDLAL v. NATHU LAL AND ANR
CW/12654/2012 · 2025-02-03
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9593 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9593 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:4706] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR ,l-ch- flfoy fjV fifV'ku Øekad 12654/2012 uUnyky iq= fo'kuyky] vk;q 62 o"kZ fuoklh xzke v;kuk rg0 ihiYnk ftyk dksVk jkt0 &;kfpdkdrkZ@izfroknh cuke 1- ukFkwyky iq= tkudhyky] vk;q 80 o"kZ fuoklh xzke mn;iqfj;k rg0 ekaxjksy ftyk ckjka gky edku ua0 2&ds&10] jaxckM+h ;kstuk dksVk jkt0 ¼e`rd½ tfj;s fof/kd izfrfuf/k 1@1 ckcwyky iq= Lo ukFkwyyky fuoklh 2&ds&10] jaxckMh] foLrkj ;kstuk dksVk jkt0 1@2 j?kqukFkh ckbZ ifRu Lo- ukFkwyky mez 70 o"kZ xzke mn;iqfj;k rg- ekaxjksy ftyk ckajk gky edku ua0 2&ds&10] jaxckMh ;kstuk dksVk jkt0 1@3 yfyrk ifRu Lo0 egkohj fuoklh cMkxkao rg0 ekaxjksy ftyk ckjka jkt0 1@4 'khyk ifRu Hkjrflag vk;q 30 o"kZ fuoklh ryoaMh] dksVk jkt0 2- U;k;ky; vij ftyk U;k;ky; dze 4 dksVk jkt0 &vizkFkhZ For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Ayushi Shrivastava for Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Srivastava For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order 03/02/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with passage of time, the prayer made in the instant petition has become infructuous, therefore, he does not press the writ petition.
2. Accordingly, instant petition is dismissed as not press.
3. Stay application and any other pending application, if any, stand disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /277