Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 95912 (MAD)

G.MOHANAKRISHNAN v. THE GENERAL MANAGER

WP/33588/2025 · 2025-09-08

A D Jagadish Chandira

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P. No.33588 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 08.09.2025 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA W.P. No.33588 of 2025 1. G. Mohanakrishnan 2. K. Velu 3. R. Rasu .... Petitioners vs. The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd., Kanchipuram Region, Chennai Bangalore National Highway, Karapettai, Kanchipuram – 631 552. ... Respondent Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to pay 15 days Surrender Leave Salary, surrendered in January 2019 with last retirement month 10 days salary with 10% interest to the petitioner. For petitioners : Mr.S.T. Varadarajulu For respondent : Mr. S. Pavithra Standing Counsel for TNSTC - - - - - - ORDER 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.33588 of 2025 By consent of both the parties, this writ petition has been taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself. Ms. S. Pavithra, learned Standing Counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent. 2. The petitioners have worked in the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation and retired from service. At the time of retirement, the petitioners were holding the posts of Special Grade Conductors, Drivers and Foreman respectively and they have successfully completed 25-30 years of service. It is the grievance of the petitioners that after retirement, the respondent /Corporation did not settle the surrender leave salary due to them. Further, it is the contention of the 2nd petitioner that the terminal benefits have also not been settled to him, till date. Under such circumstances, they have sent representations on 09.03.2025 seeking for the aforesaid payments along with interest for the belated payments. It is the case of the petitioners that neither their representations were considered nor their dues were settled by the respondent. Hence, this writ petition. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the materials available on record. 4. Learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent fairly 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.33588 of 2025 submitted that the respondent will consider the petitioners' representations and appropriate directions in this regard may be issued by this Court. 5. In view of the fair submissions made by the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent, without going into the merits of the case, this Court directs the respondent to consider the petitioners' representations seeking for surrender leave salary / terminal benefits, if any, due to the petitioners with applicable interest and pass orders on merits and in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. With the above directions, this Writ Petition stands disposed of. No costs. 08.09.2025 Internet:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes/No vsi2 A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P. No.33588 of 2025 vsi2 To The General Manager, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Villupuram) Ltd., Kanchipuram Region, Chennai Bangalore National Highway, Karapettai, Kanchipuram – 631 552. W.P. No.33588 of 2025 08.09.2025 (½) 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis