Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 95907 (ALL)

SANTOSH KUMAR RAI v. STATE OF UP AND 2 OTHERS

WRIA/13700/2025 · 2025-09-11

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13700 of 2025 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:- " I) Issue suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the order dated 06.08.2025 passed by the respondent no.3 (Vide Annexure No. 1 to this writ petition) with all it's consequential effects. II) Issue suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus restraining the respondents specially the respondent no.3 from interfering in the working of the petitioner as Officiating Principal in the College, in any manner whatsoever pursuant to the order dated 06.08.2025 passed by the respondent no.3." 2. After some length of argument, Ms. Somya Chaturvedi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner, on instructions made innocuous prayer that petitioner has already moved an application/representation before respondent no.2 District Inspector of Schools, Mau and the same may be directed to be decided expeditiously in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to both the sides. 3. Per contra, Sri G. K. Singh, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Shailendra Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.3 vehemently opposed the instant petition on merits but he has no objection to the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard Ms. Somya Chaturvedi, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner, Sri G. K. Singh, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Shailendra Sharma, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent no.3 and Sri Santosh Kumar, learned Standing Counsel appearing on Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sanjay Kumar Mishra, Somya Chaturvedi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shailendra Sharma Santosh Kumar Rai .....Petitioner(s) State Of Up And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) behalf of State-respondents and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5.Taking into consideration the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and no objection from other side, without entering into the merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 6. Respondent no.2 District Inspector of Schools, Mau is directed to decide the application/representation of the petitioner dated 09.08.2025 pending before him in accordance with law after giving opportunity of hearing to all effected parties, expeditiously, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 7.With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. September 12, 2025 AKT WRIA No. 13700 of 2025 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad