Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9590 (AP)

N BALA VENKATESWARA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/5862/2024 · 2025-01-03

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010106382024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 5862/2024 Between: 1. N BALA VENKATESWARA RAO, JL IN TELUGU, MJPAPBCWR SCHOOL/JR. COLLEGE (BOYS), NIZAMPATNAM, BAPATIA DISTINCT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY PRINICPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, B.C. WELFARE DEPARTMENT, 1ST FLOOR, BLOCK NO.3, A.P. SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522503 2. MAHATMA JYOTIBA PHULE ANDHRA PRADESH RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY MJPAPBCWREIS, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, F-9, 2ND FLOOR, STREET NO.4, BANDI STANLEY STREET, UMASANKAR NAGAR, KANURU, VIJAYAWADA -10, ANDHRA PRADESH 3. THE AUDIT OFFICER, ANDHRA PRADESH RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION SOCIETY (APREIS), AUDIT OFFICE, PAMULAPARTHI SIVAIAH COMPLEX, NAIDU PETA, KORITIPADU, NEAR MOURYA HOTEL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH 4. THE PRINCIPAL, MAHATMA JYOTIBA PHULE ANDHRA PRADESH RESIDENTIAL EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS SOCIETY (MJPAPBCWREIS) SCHOOL AND COLLEGE (BOYS), NIZAMPATNAM, BAPATIA DISTIRCT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ order or direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents, particularly the 2nd respondent in issuing the impugned order dated 06-04- 2023 vide its Rc.No.Estt /Al/198/Prl/2022, dt.06-04-2023, refixing the pay scale of petitioner into lower scale, though the petitioner is eligible for higher pay scale as he has completed his 24 years in TGT Post under SPP-II and taking Principal (School) Pay Scale, and thereby ordering the recovery of the excess paid amounts, without even bothering to call for an explanation from petitioner as highly illegal, arbitrary, violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India and also the principles of natural justice and set-aside the impugned orders dt.06- 04-2023 and direct the respondents not to recover any amount from the petitioner in pursuance of the impugned order. and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to recover any amounts from the petitioner pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES II (AP) The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: In pursuance of the Memo filed vide USR No.125255 of 2024 dated 31.12.2024, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 03.01.2025 KAS 124 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.5862 OF 2024 Date: 03.01.2025 KAS