HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - B No. - 3820 of 2025 Court No. - 50 HON'BLE AJAY BHANOT, J. The revising court by the impugned order has condoned the delay of two months in filing the revision. The delay was not inordinate and good explanation was given for the same. There is no error on the part of the revising court in condoning the delay. The endeavour of the courts should be to do substantive justice by adjudicating the controversy on merits instead of shutting the doors of justice to parties on technical grounds. The revising court has found that the appellate authority had made the findings without calling for onsite inspection report. On this footing the matter has been remitted to the appellate authority. There is infirmity in the impugned order. No interference is called for. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. September 19, 2025 Dhananjai Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Umesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Ajay Bhanot,J.) Rakesh Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 6 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- DHANANJAI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad