RAM BAHADUR v. STATE OF U.P. THROUGH SECRETARY REVENUE AND 12 OTHERS
WRIC/32999/2025 · 2025-09-18
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 95889 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 95889 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 32999 of 2025 Court No. - 34 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J.
1. This writ petition has been filed with the following prayer;
"Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent no.3 to decide the computerized case No. T202202030309089 (Ram Bahadur Vs. Sant Lal and others) Annexure No.1) filed U/s-116 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 in the pursuance of order dated 31.01.2023 passed by this Hon'ble Court."
2. It is contended that partition suit filed under Section 116 of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 is pending consideration before the respondent no.
3. The sole prayer made in writ petition for expeditious disposal of the same.
3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending or issuing notice to the private respondents, the writ petition is being
disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit, with a direction upon respondent No. 3 to decide the Computerized Case No. T-202202030309089 (Ram Bahadur Vs. Sant Lal and others), in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of this
order.
4. With the aforesaid direction, present writ petition stands disposed of.
5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the case on merit. September 19, 2025 Shekhar Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brahma Nand Pandey, Kamlesh Kumar Saroj Counsel for Respondent(s) : Azad Rai, C.S.C. (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Ram Bahadur .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Through Secretary Revenue And 12 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad