HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 11067 of 2025 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed for following relief: "Issue a direction to the learned court below/ Civil Judge (Garvi) (S.D.) to Allahabad decide the 6-C Application Original Case No. 1055 of 2025 (Roshan Lal Versus Jagdish and another), expeditiously within specific period as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper." 3. Contention of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that an application for interim injunction (6C Application) is pending consideration and the same has not been decided despite several dates have been fixed. He prayed that the same may be decided, expeditiously. 4. In view of above, no useful purpose would be served in keeping this petition pending. 5. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to the Civil Judge (Garvi) (S.D.) Allahabad to consider and decide the interim injunction application (6C Application), in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Satyadeep Gautam Counsel for Respondent(s) : Roshan Lal .....Petitioner(s) Jagdish And Another .....Respondent(s) within a period of twelve weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order after ensuring service upon all the concerned parties as well as giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties provided that there is no other legal impediment. September 16, 2025 Ved Prakash A227 No. 11067 of 2025 2 (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad