Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 95879 (PAT)

Vinesh Prasad Sah @ Binesh Pd. Sah @ Vinesh Sah v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./63085/2025 · 2025-09-15

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63085 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-179 Year-2025 Thana- PALASI District- Araria ====================================================== Vinesh Prasad Sah @ Binesh Pd. Sah @ Vinesh Sah S/o Kamlu Sah R/o Village- Badhouli Ward No. 13, P.S.- Palasi, District- Araria ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Rana, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ramchandra Sahni, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 15-09-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109, 76, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 351(3) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.. 3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that this petitioner assaulted on the head of informant with Dabiya. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. As a matter of fact, on account of land dispute between the parties, simple maar-peet took place in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter- case. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63085 of 2025(2) dt.15-09-2025 2/2 5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the F.I.R. with specific accusation that he assaulted on the head of informant with Dabiya. Doctor has found the injuries sustained by the injured as grievous in nature. Petitioner has got one criminal antecedent. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, specific and direct nature of accusation, nature of injuries sustained by the injured and criminal antecedent of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is rejected. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T