Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
AT CHANDIGARH
118
CRM-M-47914-2025 Date of decision : 29.08.2025 MANPREET SINGH
...... PETITIONER VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
...... RESPONDENTS
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Bhatnagar, Advocate for the petitioner. ***** SURYA PARTAP SINGH
. J.(Oral)
1. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioner for issuance of directions to the respondents No.2 and 3 to conduct the fair investigation in case FIR No.0123 dated 10.12.2024, under Sections 333, 324(4), 351(2) of BNS, 2023 Police Station Kathu Nangal, District Amritsar.
2. The learned counsel representing the petitioner submits that the petitioner has filed a representation dated 16.06.2025 (Annexure P-2) before the respondent No.2-Senior Superintendent of Police, Amritsar Rural. The learned counsel prays for directions to the respondent No.2 to decide the abovementioned representation within a stipulated time.
3. Notice of motion to the respondents-State.
VIPIN KUMAR 2025.09.04 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order
CRM-M-47914-2025 2
4. Since advance notice has already been served upon the State, Mr. Eklavya Darshi, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondents-State and waives service.
5.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a direction for deciding the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P-2) be given to the respondent No.2 and that the instant petition be disposed of accordingly.
6. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to pass a speaking order and decide the representation of the petitioner (Annexure P- 2) within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant
order. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Amritsar Rural shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment of the threat perception to the petitioner, and take a decision on the issue of providing security to him. However, it is made clear that there is no observation of this Court with regard to merits of the case and the police authorities shall be at liberty to draw their own conclusion without being influenced by the contents of instant order.
(SURYA PARTAP SINGH)
JUDGE 29.08.2025 vipin Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes
Whether Reportable : No VIPIN KUMAR 2025.09.04 09:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this judgment/order