Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRM-M-53610-2023 (O&M) and -1 CRM-M-11144-2025 (O&M) 291 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-53610-2023 (O&M)
Date of Decision:07.04.2025 (I) Hunny ....Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and another
.....Respondent(s) CRM-M-11144-2025 (O&M)
Date of Decision:07.04.2025 (I) Hunny ....Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and another
.....Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASGURPREET SINGH PURI Present: Mr. A.K. Khunger, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Surinder Kumar Dagar, DAG, Haryana. Mr. Shubham Kaushik, Advocate, for respondent No.2. **** JASGURPREET SINGH PURI
, J. (Oral)
1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of both the petitions by stating that the petitioner has left the country, although no permission was granted for the same.
2. At this stage, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent No.2 stated that the petitioner has not once but for about 14 times has left the RAKESH KUMAR 2025.04.09 16:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment
Court and liberty may be granted to respondent No.2 to move any appropriate application for seeking attendance of the petitioner before the learned trial Court or before this Court in in accordance with law.
3. Dismissed as withdrawn.
4. Liberty is granted to respondent No.2 to move any appropriate application in this regard.
5. Since the petition for grant of anticipatory bail is withdrawn, the interim order dated 19.10.2023 stands vacated. 07.04.2025
(JASGURPREET SINGH PURI) rakesh JUDGE Whether speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No RAKESH KUMAR 2025.04.09 16:15 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment