[129] Surjeet Singh State of Haryana and others Coram : Present : SANDEEP MOUDGIL [1] 226 and 22 of mandamus to direct for regularization under the Government Policy dated 07.03.1996 along with 18.03.1996 (Annexure P [2] prays for withdrawal of the present petition. [3] [4] 28.08.2025 ‘Rajneesh' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-25262 Date of Decision : Surjeet Singh versus State of Haryana and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Mr. Anuj Gupta, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana. *** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J. (ORAL) The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked 227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondents to for regularization under the Government Policy dated 07.03.1996 along with 18.03.1996 (Annexure P-3). After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition. Prayer is accepted. Dismissed as withdrawn. 28.08.2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 25262-2025 Date of Decision : 28.08.2025 …Petitioner ….Respondents SANDEEP MOUDGIL Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana. The jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked under Article 7 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature to consider the claim of the petitioner for regularization under the Government Policy dated 07.03.1996 along with After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the present petition. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No under Articles 7 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature consider the claim of the petitioner for regularization under the Government Policy dated 07.03.1996 along with After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner ) RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.08.29 17:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document