IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 237 CWP-27514-2022 Date of decision : 27.03.2025 Akhilesh Chatly ..... Petitioner VERSUS Kotak Mahindra Prime Limited ………..... Respondent CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Present: Ms. Tanya Trehan, Advocate, for Mr. Harsh Chopra, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sukhdeep Singh, Advocate, for Mr. ADS Sukhija, Advocate, for respondent-Bank. ***** KULDEEP TIWARI , J. (Oral) 1. Through the instant writ petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India, a prayer is made for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for challenging the act of respondent forcibly recovering the vehicle of the petitioner bearing No.PB 91A 9099. 2. During the pendency of this petition, the matter has been referred to Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court. The efforts made by the Mediator yielded fruit and the matter was compromised. The settlement agreement was signed before the Mediator by both the parties concerned. 3. In view of the settlement agreement, counsel for the petitioner does not want to contest the instant petition. Instant petition is disposed of accordingly. Both the parties are ordered to be bound by the settlement agreement dated 13.02.2025 executed before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE 27.03.2025 anil Whether speaking / reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No ANIL KUMAR 2025.04.01 13:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document