Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9584 (PNJ)

JAGTAR SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CRR/37/2022 · 2025-04-03

Harpreet Singh Brar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

253 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA JAGTAR SINGH STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. Present: None Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Rajdeep Singh Gill, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 4. HARPREET SINGH BRAR 1. Present revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 29.10.2021 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur vide which, the application under Section 319 summoning of respondent No dismissed, in case stemming from FIR No.40 dated 24.02.2019 registered under Sections 306/34 of IPC at Police Station Sadar Dhuri, District Sangrur. 2. Despite, the case having been called twice, there is no representation on behalf of the petitione nor his counsel is interested in pursuing the present petition. 3. Under these circumstances, having left with no other option, the present petition stands dismissed for want of April 03, 2025 manisha (i) (ii) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH JAGTAR SINGH V/S PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR None for the petitioner. Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Rajdeep Singh Gill, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 to 4. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) Present revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 29.10.2021 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur vide which, the application under Section 319 Cr.P.C. summoning of respondent Nos.2 to 4 as additional accused has been dismissed, in case stemming from FIR No.40 dated 24.02.2019 registered under Sections 306/34 of IPC at Police Station Sadar Dhuri, District Sangrur. Despite, the case having been called twice, there is no entation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that neither the petitioner counsel is interested in pursuing the present petition. Under these circumstances, having left with no other option, the present petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution accordingly. (HARPREET SINGH BRAR Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRR-37-2022 Date of decision: 03.04.2025 ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENTS HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr. Ramesh Kumar Ambavta, AAG, Haryana. Present revision petition has been preferred against the order dated 29.10.2021 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Sangrur vide Cr.P.C. filed by the petitioner for s.2 to 4 as additional accused has been dismissed, in case stemming from FIR No.40 dated 24.02.2019 registered under Sections 306/34 of IPC at Police Station Sadar Dhuri, District Sangrur. Despite, the case having been called twice, there is no . It appears that neither the petitioner counsel is interested in pursuing the present petition. Under these circumstances, having left with no other option, the prosecution accordingly. HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No MANISHA 2025.04.07 17:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticiy of this order/judgment