AVESH PRATAP SINGH ALIAS AKASH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER
A482/30892/2024 · 2025-09-08
Yogesh Dubey Joint Registrar Judicial
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 95836 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 95836 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 30892 of 2024 Court No. - 89 HON'BLE JITENDRA KUMAR SINHA, J.
1. The matter is taken up on mentioning. 2. Heard Shri Amit Rai, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Sarvendra Kumar Pandey holding brief of Sri Abhyudaya Tripathi, learned AGA for the State. 3. Instant application has been preferred for quashing the entire proceeding of session trial no. 383 of 2019 arising out of Case Crime No. 913 of 2018, under sections 323, 504, 506 and 307 IPC, P.S. Colonelganj, District Prayagraj pending before the court of learned Additional District Judge, Court No. 9, Allahabad against the applicant on the basis of compromise which is taken place between the first informant and applicant. It is also prayed to stay the further proceeding of aforesaid case during pendency of the present application. 4. It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that both the parties have amicably settled all the disputes and they have agreed for withdrawal of all cases, including present case, pending between the parties and the same has been verified by the court concerned. A report regarding the same is available on record. It is also submitted that no one has received injury in the alleged incident. It is further submitted that in view of these facts and circumstances, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the impugned proceedings pending and thus, the impugned proceedings may be quashed on the basis of compromise arrived at Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amit Rai Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Abhyudaya Tripathi, Dhananjay Kumar Pandey, G.A. Avesh Pratap Singh Alias Akash .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s)
between the parties. 5. Learned A.G.A. for the State as well as learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has no objection. 6. I have considered the submissions and perused the record. 7. Both the parties have amicably settled all the disputes and they have agreed for withdrawal of all cases, including present case, pending between the parties and the same has been verified by the court concerned. A report regarding the same is available on record. No one has received injury in the alleged incident Considering the law laid down in the case of State of Madhya Pradesh Vs.
Laxmi Narayan and others, AIR 2019 SC 1296 and the facts of the matter, it would be in the interest of justice that the impugned proceedings be quashed. 8. In view of the aforesaid,entire proceedings of the session trial no. 383 of 2019 arising out of Case Crime No. 913 of 2018, under sections 323, 504, 506 and 307 IPC, P.S. Colonelganj, District Prayagraj pending before the court of learned Additional District Judge, Court No. 9, Allahabad , against applicant, are hereby quashed. 9. The application is allowed. September 9, 2025 SY A482 No. 30892 of 2024 2 (Jitendra Kumar Sinha,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUSHAMA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad