IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67645 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-641 Year-2025 Thana- MAHUA District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1. Suraj Kumar Mahto @ Suraj Kumar S/o- Pradeep Mahto R/v- Laxminarayanpur Chakisun W.No-5, Ps- Mahua Dist- Vaishali 2. Nitish Mahto @ Nitish Kumar S/o- Dilip Mahto R/v- Laxminarayanpur Chakisun W.No-5, Ps- Mahua Dist- Vaishali 3. Ganesh Mahto @ Ganesh Kumar S/o- Dilip Mahto R/v- Laxminarayanpur Chakisun W.No-5, Ps- Mahua Dist- Vaishali 4. Kamlesh Mahto @ Kamlesh Kumar S/o- Maheshwar Mahto R/v- Laxminarayanpur Chakisun W.No-5, Ps- Mahua Dist- Vaishali 5. Arjun Mahto @ Arjun Kumar S/o- Maheshwar Mahto R/v- Laxminarayanpur Chakisun W.No-5, Ps- Mahua Dist- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Prabhat, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Indiwar Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2. 23-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 76, 303(2), 352, 351(2) & 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioners submits that as per F.I.R. itself, specific accusation of causing assault by means of sword and axe to Bhaisur and husband of informant is against co-accused Dilip Mahto and Pradeep Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67645 of 2025(2) dt.23-09-2025 2/2 Mahto, on account of which, both of them sustained grievous injuries. So far as these petitioners are concerned, there is general & omnibus allegation and no specific overt act has alleged against them. He further submits that both parties are next door neighbours and due to petty dispute, the alleged Maarpit took place. Petitioners claim clean antecedent. 4. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. 5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. - IV, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Mahua P.S. Case No. 641 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482 of the B.N.S.S., 2023. anay (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T