Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 958 (ORI)

RAMESH CHANDRA SAHU v. STATE OF ODISHA

BLAPL/11945/2025 · 2026-02-12

Gourishankar Satapathy

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.11945 of 2025 Ramesh Chandra Sahu … Petitioner Mr. S.R. Mulia, Advocate -versus- State of Orissa … Opposite Party Mr. P. Satpathy, Addl. PP CORAM: JUSTICE G. SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER(ORAL) 12.02.2026 02. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical Mode). 2. This is a bail application U/S.483 of BNSS by the petitioner for grant of bail in connection with CRRI PS Case No.72 of 2024 corresponding to G.R. Case No.283 of 2024 pending in the file of learned J.M.F.C. (City), Cuttack for commission of offences punishable U/Ss.419/420/468 of BNS, on the main allegation of cheating the informant and others for a sum of Rs.4,96,000/- on the pretext of providing a job in Jindal Company. 3. Heard Mr. Satya Ranjan Mulia, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. P. Satpathy, learned Addl. PP in the matter and perused the record. 4. After having considered the rival submissions and taking into consideration the nature and gravity of the offences as alleged against the petitioner vis-à-vis the accusation sought to be brought against him and regard being had to the pre-trial detention of the petitioner in custody since 10.09.2025 with submission of charge-sheet in the meantime and taking into account the other circumstances on record in entirety including the inherent right of the accused to be presumed innocent until proven guilty at the trial, this Court without expressing any view on merit admits the petitioner to bail. 5. Hence, the bail application of the petitioner stands allowed and the petitioner is allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand) only with one solvent surety each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Court in seisin of the case on such terms and conditions as deem fit and proper by it. 6. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. A soft copy of this order be immediately communicated to the concerned Court, who shall afterwards communicate the same to the concerned Jail through e- mail for reference. (G. Satapathy) Judge Pravakar