110 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-25800-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 05.09.2025 SHEELA KUMARI .....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENT(S) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Ishaan Bhardwaj, Advocate for the petitioner(s). Mr. Sushil Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana. **** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for Issuance of a writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned promotion order dated 25.10.2024 (P-15) passed by the respondents rejecting the claim of the petitioner, in violation of the Judgement dated 28.01.2022 (P-12) passed by Hon'ble Supreme court of India & in violation of the reservation policy as applicable from time to time. After having heard for some time, learned State Counsel has candidly admitted that while passing the impugned order dated 25.10.2024 (Annexure P- 15), the ratio laid down in the judgment passed Larger Bench of the Supreme Court in in the matter of ‘Jarnail Singh vs. Lachhmi Narain Gupta’ 2022 (1), SCT, 601 has not been taken into consideration. Anuradha 2025.09.05 06:57 I agree to specified portions of this document CWP-25800-2025 (O&M) 2 In light of the above, learned State Counsel is directed to reconsider the issue and claim raised by the petitioner and decide the representation after providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioner filed by the petitioner afresh after considering the judgment passed in Jarnail Singh’s case (supra) within a period of 8 weeks from today. Copy of the same shall be provided to the petitioner one week thereafter. Petition stands disposed of in the above said terms. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 05.09.2025 JUDGE anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No Anuradha 2025.09.05 06:57 I agree to specified portions of this document