Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Delhi · body

2025 DAILYLAW 9576 (DEL)

RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.

W.P.(C)/1726/2025 · 2025-02-12

Ajay Digpaul, C Hari Shankar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP(C) 1726/2025 $~86 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1726/2025 and CM APPL. 8342/2025 RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jai Wadhwa and Mr. Ronak Karanpuria, Advocates. versus GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ....Respondent Through: Mr. Gaurav Dhingra and Mr. Shashank Singh, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL JUDGMENT (ORAL) % 12.02.2025 C. HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. The impugned order reads thus: “M.A. No. 125/2025 The present M.A. has been filed seeking preponement of date of hearing. Issue notice to the respondents. List on 12.02.2025.” 2. 12 February 2025 is incidentally today. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that this is a legal aid matter. Essentially, in that view of the matter, we are frankly unhappy that such a petition has Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:13.02.2025 20:24:40 Signature Not Verified WP(C) 1726/2025 been filed. It is the responsibility of the counsel who appear in legal aid matters to advise their clients appropriately. Had this petition not been a legal aid petition, it would have invited exemplary costs. 3. It is obvious that such a petition is a complete abuse of the process of the Court. 4. The petition is accordingly dismissed. C. HARI SHANKAR, J. AJAY DIGPAUL, J. FEBRUARY 12, 2025/yg Click here to check corrigendum, if any Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:13.02.2025 20:24:40