RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
W.P.(C)/1726/2025 · 2025-02-12
Ajay Digpaul, C Hari Shankar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9576 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9576 (DEL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
WP(C) 1726/2025
$~86 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1726/2025 and CM APPL. 8342/2025
RAKESH KUMAR GUPTA
.....Petitioner Through: Mr. Jai Wadhwa and Mr. Ronak Karanpuria, Advocates.
versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ....Respondent Through: Mr. Gaurav Dhingra and Mr. Shashank Singh, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL
JUDGMENT (ORAL) %
12.02.2025
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
1. The impugned order reads thus:
“M.A. No. 125/2025 The present M.A. has been filed seeking preponement of date of hearing. Issue notice to the respondents. List on 12.02.2025.”
2. 12 February 2025 is incidentally today. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that this is a legal aid matter. Essentially, in that view of the matter, we are frankly unhappy that such a petition has Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:13.02.2025 20:24:40 Signature Not Verified
WP(C) 1726/2025
been filed. It is the responsibility of the counsel who appear in legal aid matters to advise their clients appropriately. Had this petition not been a legal aid petition, it would have invited exemplary costs.
3. It is obvious that such a petition is a complete abuse of the process of the Court.
4. The petition is accordingly dismissed.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
AJAY DIGPAUL, J.
FEBRUARY 12, 2025/yg
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
Digitally Signed By:AJIT KUMAR Signing Date:13.02.2025 20:24:40