134 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No. 3404 of 2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: 29.07.2025 Alamgir Khan .......... Petitioner Versus Sukhwinder Singh Tiwana, BDPO-1 (Block Development & Panchayat Officer), Patiala .......... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Present: Mr. Naresh Ghai, Advocate for the petitioner (through video-conferencing). Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Additional Advocate General, Punjab for the respondent. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) As per learned counsel for the petitioner, petition under Section 7 of The Punjab Village Common Land (Regulation) Act, 1961 was preferred at the instance of Block Development & Panchayat Officer, Patiala, wherein order of eviction order was passed. [2] In pursuance thereof, learned counsel for the respondent, on instructions from the respondent-Sukhwinder Singh Tiwana, BDPO, Patiala, submits that maturity of possession in terms of eviction order stands restored in favour of Gram Panchayat; thus, no cause survives in the present petition. [3] In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt petition, the same is disposed off accordingly. Dinesh Kumar 2025.07.29 17:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document COCP No. 3404 of 2023 (O&M) [2] [4] In case the petitioner feels aggrieved, he shall be at liberty to avail remedy as per law. [5] Rule stands discharged. [6] Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed off. July 29, 2025 ( HARKESH MANUJA ) 'dk kamra' JUDGE Whether Speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether Reportable Yes/No Dinesh Kumar 2025.07.29 17:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document