CRM-M-239-2025 294 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Danish @ Kureshi State of Punjab and Anr. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. Present: Mr. Rahul Kumar Adia, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C.) Mr. Rishabh Singla, AAG, Punjab. HARPREET SINGH BRAR 1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No. 09.09.2023 under Sections Town, District proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated (Annexure P-2). 2. The following order was passed on 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: 1 Danish @ Kureshi V/S State of Punjab and Anr. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr. Rahul Kumar Adia, Advocate for the petitioner (through V.C.) Mr. Rishabh Singla, AAG, Punjab. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (ORAL) This petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No. under Sections 406, 420 of IPC registered at Police Station rict Hoshiarpur (Annexure P-1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 2). The following order was passed on “ This petition has been filed under Section 528 of Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.219 dated 09.09.2023 under Sections 406/420 of IPC registered at Police Station Model Town, District Hoshiarpur (Annexure P subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on th deed dated 30.11.2024 (Annexure P Notice of motion for 11.02.2025. At this stage, on the asking of the Court, Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl.A.G., Punjab with Mr. S.S. Goripuria, DAG, Punjab, accept notice on behalf of respondent No.1-State and Mr. Nirmal Singh, Advocate accepts notice for respondent No.2 and files his to the factum of compromise. Copy of the paper book be supplied to them during the course of day. Service is complete. In the meanwhile, the parties learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within two weeks from today or any other date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, to get their statements recorded regarding compromise and after recording their statements, learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send report regarding the genuineness of compromise and also to intimate whether any PO proceedings are pending against any of the party on or before the date fixed. A copy of the order be sent to Magistrate through fax for compliance. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-239-2025 Date of decision: 17.03.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondents HARPREET SINGH BRAR This petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.219 dated registered at Police Station Model 1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise dated 30.11.2024 The following order was passed on 09.01.2025 :- This petition has been filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 seeking quashing of FIR No.219 dated 09.09.2023 under Sections 406/420 of IPC registered at Police Station Model Town, District Hoshiarpur (Annexure P-1) along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of compromise deed dated 30.11.2024 (Annexure P-2). Notice of motion for 11.02.2025. At this stage, on the asking of the Court, Mr. Subhash Godara, Addl.A.G., Punjab with Mr. S.S. Goripuria, DAG, Punjab, accept notice State and Mr. Nirmal Singh, Advocate for respondent No.2 and files his vakalatnama and admits compromise. Copy of the paper book be supplied to them In the meanwhile, the parties are directed to appear before the learned trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate within two weeks from today or any date convenient to the trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate, to get their recorded regarding compromise and after recording their trial Court/Illaqa Magistrate is directed to send genuineness of compromise and also to intimate are pending against any of the party on or A copy of the order be sent to learned trial Court/Illaqa fax for compliance.” MAHIMA 2025.03.21 12:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-239-2025 3. Thereafter, on appear before the jurisdictional/Illaqa Magistrate within a period of two weeks. In compliance of the aforesaid order the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from anyone. 4. In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in and another, (2014) 6 SCC 46 Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Cr is allowed and FIR No. registered at Police Station and all consequential proceedings arising out of the same petitioner. March 17, 2025 mahima (i) (ii) 2025 2 Thereafter, on 11.02.2025, the parties were again directed to appear before the jurisdictional/Illaqa Magistrate within a period of two In compliance of the aforesaid orders, a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from anyone. In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the e Supreme Court in Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab and another, (2014) 6 SCC 46, and Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. Kaushalya (Mrs.) and others (1980) 1 SCC 63 and Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Cr FIR No.219 dated 09.09.2023 under Sections registered at Police Station Model Town, District and all consequential proceedings arising out of the same (HARPREET SINGH BRAR 5 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable , the parties were again directed to appear before the jurisdictional/Illaqa Magistrate within a period of two , a report has been received from the concerned jurisdictional Court that the compromise between the parties is genuine and arrived at without any pressure or coercion from anyone. In view of the compromise and the ratio of law laid down by the Narinder Singh and others vs. State of Punjab Shakuntala Sawhney (Mrs) Vs. and Full Bench of this Court in Kulwinder Singh Vs. State of Punjab 2007 (3) RCR (Crl.) 1052, this petition under Sections 406, 420 of IPC , District Hoshiarpur (Annexure P-1) and all consequential proceedings arising out of the same are quashed, qua the HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No MAHIMA 2025.03.21 12:56 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.