ASIT KUMAR ACHARYA ALIAS ASIT ACHARYA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3317/2025 · 2025-04-28
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9575 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 9575 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:12718 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 3317 of 2025
------ Asit Kumar Acharya @ Asit Acharya, aged about 48 years, S/o Late Chittaranjan Acharya, R/o. Ward No. 2, Indratandi, P.O. + P.S. –Seraikella, Dist: Seraikella –Kharswan, Jharkhand.
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Mahesh Tewari, Advocate
: Mr. Abhishek Kr. Dubey, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Sudhir Kr. Mahto, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 28.04.2025
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Seraikella P.S. Case No.34 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons committed the dowry death of his wife namely Rekha Rani Acharya. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false. It is then submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner, drawing attention of this Court, to the deposition of the witnesses, so far examined in this case, that the P.W.1, P.W.3, P.W.4, P.W.5 and P.W.6 have all been declared hostile on the prayer of the prosecution and have not supported the case of the prosecution. It is further submitted that even the P.W.3 who is the mother of the deceased, has also not supported the case of the prosecution. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 15.07.2024, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 05 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to
cooperate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District & Additional Sessions Judge- I, Seraikella, in connection with Seraikella P.S. Case No.34 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
Sonu-Gunjan/