KOTKAPURA TRUCK OPERATOR UNION FARIDKOT THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED MEMBER v. DILRAJ SINGH IAS AND OTHERS
COCP/3332/2023 · 2025-09-19
Vikas Bahl
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 95715 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 95715 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
205 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
COCP-3332-2023 (O&M) Date of decision: 19.09.2025 Kotkapura Truck Operator Union Faridkot ...Petitioner Versus Dilraj Singh and others ...Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL Present: Mr. Jatinder Singh Mundi, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Anamika Sheoran, Advocate for Mr. Vikas Singh, Advocate for respondent No.5. Mr. Anupam Singla, Advocate for respondent No.6. Mr. Anil Kumar Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.7. Mr. Sunish Bindlish, Sr. Standing Counsel and Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.9/FCI. Ms. Ankita, Advocate for Mr. T. S. Sidhu, Advocate for respondent No.10. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL)
1. This is a Contempt Petition filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for initiation of contempt proceedings against respondent Nos.5 to 10 for intentionally and willfully disobeying the
order dated 08.03.2019 (Annexure P-3) passed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, has very fairly submitted that the present contempt petition has been rendered infructuous and the same may kindly be disposed of as such.
3. In view of the above, the present contempt petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. 19.09.2025 (VIKAS BAHL) Pawan JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2025.09.19 16:47 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document