Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 95711 (PNJ)

KULDEEP SHARMA v. PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT CHANDIGARH AND ORS

CWP/25213/2025 · 2025-09-11

Kuldeep Tiwari

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-25213 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Kuldeep Sharma and others Punjab and CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the letters dated 10.01.2025 (Annexure P 15.04.2025 (Annexure P for stepping up their pay with their juniors, has been declined. A Mandamus is also prayed for, commanding the respondent authorities, for stepping up the pay of the petitioners with their juniors. 2. on instructions, submits that claim of the petitioners will be decided by the competent authority, by passing a speaking order, within a period of eight weeks from the date of passing of the order. 5213-2025 -1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Kuldeep Sharma and others Versus Punjab and Haryana High Court, Chandigarh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, for the petitioners. Dr. Payal Mehta, Advocate, for respondents No.1 and 2. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J. (Oral) Through the instant writ petition, of the Constitution of India, a Certiorari is prayed for, to quash the letters dated 10.01.2025 (Annexure P- 15.04.2025 (Annexure P-4 to P-6), vide which, claim of the petitioners for stepping up their pay with their juniors, has been declined. A Mandamus is also prayed for, commanding the respondent authorities, for stepping up the pay of the petitioners with their juniors. At the outset, learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2, on instructions, submits that claim of the petitioners will be decided by the competent authority, by passing a speaking order, within a period of eight weeks from the date of passing of the order. 1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-25213-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: 11.09.2025 ….Petitioners Haryana High Court, Chandigarh and others ….Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Advocate, Through the instant writ petition, as cast under Articles a Certiorari is prayed for, to quash -2), 09.04.2025 (Annexure P-3), ide which, claim of the petitioners for stepping up their pay with their juniors, has been declined. A Mandamus is also prayed for, commanding the respondent authorities, for stepping up the pay of the petitioners with their juniors. arned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2, on instructions, submits that claim of the petitioners will be decided by the competent authority, by passing a speaking order, within a period of eight weeks from the date of passing of the order. 5 s s a Certiorari is prayed for, to quash 3), ide which, claim of the petitioners for stepping up their pay with their juniors, has been declined. A Mandamus is also prayed for, commanding the respondent authorities, arned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2, on instructions, submits that claim of the petitioners will be decided by the competent authority, by passing a speaking order, within a period of AMIT KUMAR 2025.09.11 19:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-25213 3. course suggested by learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2, and submits that let this petition be disposed of, in terms of the statement made by her. 4. the parties, the instant writ petition is accordingly 11.09.202 Ak Sharma 5213-2025 -2 Learned counsel for the petitioners is in agreement with the course suggested by learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2, and submits that let this petition be disposed of, in terms of the statement made by her. In view of the above statements made the parties, the instant writ petition is accordingly .2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable 2- arned counsel for the petitioners is in agreement with the course suggested by learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2, and submits that let this petition be disposed of, in terms of the statement In view of the above statements made by learned counsel for the parties, the instant writ petition is accordingly disposed of. (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE Yes Yes/No arned counsel for the petitioners is in agreement with the course suggested by learned counsel for respondents No.1 and 2, and submits that let this petition be disposed of, in terms of the statement by learned counsel for AMIT KUMAR 2025.09.11 19:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document