Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 95707 (ALL)

HARNARAYAN v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/13762/2025 · 2025-09-14

Manju Rani Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13762 of 2025 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Manvendra Singh, learned counsel for respondent-BSA and learned Standing Counsel for the State- respondents. The present writ petition has been filed with the prayer to direct the respondents authorities to ensure payment of salary by way of arrears for the period of 01.07.2015 to 17.11.2015 with increment taking into consideration of the order dated 18.11.2015 directing re-employment of the petitioner, further relief is sought for enhancement in amount of pension accordingly as well as for release of other consequential benefit in reference to payment of salary for claimed period. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has moved representation before the competent authority, for redressal of his grievance, but nothing has been done till date. Therefore, a direction may be issued to the respondent no.4 to take decision on the representation and pass appropriate orders in accordance with law. Learned counsel for the respondent-BSA submits that he has no objection in case fresh a representation is moved by the petitioner before the competent authority, the same will be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that petitioner may make fresh application/representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anant Prakash, Vijay Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Manvendra Singh Harnarayan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) such documents, as may be advised, before the respondent no.4 District Basic Education Officer, Mahoba, within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, respondent no.4 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. September 15, 2025 Rahul. WRIA No. 13762 of 2025 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAHUL GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad